
Bringing together nearly two hundred participants, as well as experts and project leaders in a hybrid format, this event provided an opportunity to explore the critical issues and prospects of carbon finance.
Sébastien Treyer, Director of the Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI) and Chair of the FFEM Scientific and Technical Committee, opened the event by highlighting the potential of carbon finance in the Global South and emphasizing the importance of reflecting on criteria to ensure high-quality projects.
The capitalization publication, based on a selection of forest conservation and mangrove restoration projects supported by the FFEM over the past 15 years, which were involved in generating carbon credits, was presented by Tatiana de Liedekerke from the consulting firm Hamerkop. The work includes eight recommendations derived from these projects.
Several partners participated in a panel discussion to illustrate lessons from their projects. Aissa Regalla, Director of the Institute of Biodiversity and Protected Areas of Guinea-Bissau, and Didier Monteiro, Managing Director of the Bioguinea Conservation Fundation, shared how the REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) financial mechanism has strengthened mangrove conservation by addressing the lack of public funding and engaging local communities through benefit-sharing mechanisms.
REDD+ is an innovative component of IBAP's portfolio, which now aims to secure sustainable funding. It provides greater community engagement through direct benefit-sharing and helps bolster the foundation’s endowment fund capitalization, ensuring long-term financing.
, explained Didier Monteiro.
Matthieu Tiberghien, co-director of the NGO Nitidae, shared his expertise on creating an ecological corridor in Madagascar to combat deforestation—mainly driven by subsistence farming—while preserving biodiversity and supporting local communities. He pointed out that, despite its potential, implementing REDD+ faces significant obstacles, including the volatility and complexity of national political processes and international cooperation frameworks. Thus, REDD+ should not yet be seen as a tool for financing territorial development but rather as a means of providing impetus and rationalization at the project level.
The programmatic approach of REDD+ enables the definition of an intervention framework combining both sectoral and territorial actions, using modern or more traditional tools. Carbon finance remains an excellent way to enhance the results achieved in such projects. Without public funding, it can easily cover recurring costs for monitoring protected areas, or even more, if the project generates substantial carbon credits
, concluded Matthieu Tiberghien.
However, the discussions did not shy away from the challenges posed by carbon finance. Dejdjiga Kachenoura, Carbon Finance Expert within the Executive Directorate for Innovation, Research and Strategy at the Agence Française de Développement, highlighted gaps in market regulation and integrity.
AFD and FFEM's strategies regarding carbon finance need to be oriented towards projects involving both carbon finance and the reach of development goals. Carbon finance has to create this connection.
, she recommended.
This reflection resonated with the contributions of Stéphanie Bouziges-Eschmann, Secretary General of the FFEM, and Mathilde Bord Laurans, Head of the Climate and Nature Division at the AFD. They discussed the role of carbon finance in their respective institutions' strategies.
For the FFEM, the discussion reaffirmed its pioneering role in funding pilot projects and providing policy recommendations based on capitalization efforts. The FFEM aims to maximize the social, economic, and environmental impact of carbon finance by adhering to strict project selection criteria, such as certification to the highest international standards, robust monitoring and evaluation, shared and equitable project governance, transparent and fair benefit-sharing, and the integrity of buyers.
Mathilde Bord Laurans elaborated on the AFD’s strategic approach, which emphasizes building countries' capacity to manage their strategies for carbon markets, complementing their national decarbonization plans to ensure a coherent operation of this international system.To conclude, Thomas Melonio, Chief Economist and Executive Director for Innovation, Strategy, and Research at the AFD, emphasized the need to structure the carbon market at multiple levels while valuing efforts made at the local project level.
We must not underestimate the work done at the project level, as it forms the foundation of the pyramid. The prospective and long-term structuring efforts for carbon finance are essential to mobilize countries and bridge the gap between current international agreements and what is needed to structure the market
, he stressed.
Moderated by Maëlis Borghese, in charge of valuations and capitalizations at FFEM, the panel discussion reaffirmed FFEM’s role as a pioneer in carbon finance and contributed to collective reflection on its environmental and social impact in support of sustainable development goals.
Capitalization is central to the FFEM’s strategy. By producing reference publications and organizing exchanges such as the January 21 panel discussion, the FFEM not only disseminates lessons learned and best practices from the projects it supports but also helps guide public policies toward sustainable approaches tailored to environmental challenges.
English and Spanish versions of our capitalisation book "In Focus' carbon finance: a lever for a sustainable future" will shortly be available.